Enter.
Lived context enters the system: a memory, atmosphere, choice, behavior, or response. The starting point is not a product preference. It is the human texture around an experience.
System / Lived context to signal
Scentient is a loop, not a static model. Lived context enters through memory, atmosphere, choice, behavior, and response. The system translates that context into sensory direction, renders it through a physical or environmental surface, and learns from what changes when the artifact returns to the world. The graph is the asset.
The four stages
Lived context enters the system: a memory, atmosphere, choice, behavior, or response. The starting point is not a product preference. It is the human texture around an experience.
The system reads for sensory structure: warmth, brightness, openness, texture, intensity, proximity, place, and season. The output is sensory direction, not a claim about how someone feels.
The signal becomes something testable: a scent, atmosphere, or partner-rendered experience. The artifact matters because it creates a real-world response.
Acceptance, rejection, edits, revisits, and later response update the graph. Each pass makes the next translation less generic.
The learning loop
Each pass compares context, artifact, and response. The system does not guess emotion. It learns what moves closer or farther from the intended state.
A memory, atmosphere, behavior, choice, or later response becomes the starting point.
The system translates context into sensory direction.
The signal becomes something testable in the world: scent first, then adjacent sensory surfaces.
Acceptance, rejection, comparison, revision, and revisit become learning events.
The longitudinal response graph gets clearer with each loop.
Capture Surfaces / Early interface
The first capture surface lets a person shape the scene around a memory through light, texture, weather, proximity, and atmosphere. The room is not the product. It is an instrument for turning lived context into structured sensory signal.
Other capture surfaces can follow: written memory, scent selection, spatial edits, physical feedback, partner environments, and later response.
Panoramas make memory spatial. They let a person point, compare, and refine: this corner, this light, this closeness, this weather, this room. Each adjustment can make the authored memory more legible to the system.
Lived context cannot stay visual. Human memory is not only image and language. Olfaction has unusually direct ties to brain systems involved in memory and affect, which is why scent can make a place or moment feel immediately present.
Scent becomes a grounding channel. Scentient uses that relationship carefully: not to read emotion, but to help translate authored memories and environments into sensory direction.
The Sensory Interpreter
Scentient does not only describe a scene. It extracts the sensory structure that matters: temperature, light, space, texture, proximity, intensity, and response. Those cues become sensory direction a render system can use. The system does not claim to know how someone feels. It learns what context moves closer or farther from the intended state.
Context cues
Lived context becomes renderable direction. The system learns from response, not hidden inference.
Sensory direction
The Vocabulary / The layer in plain prose
The layer, written plainly enough to understand what compounds without exposing the machinery.
A living context profile built from memory, atmosphere, selection, rejection, artifact, and response. It helps future translations begin less generically.
The system's compact representation of sensory direction. It turns context into something that can be compared, rendered, and improved.
The remembered or intended world around the signal: weather, light, space, season, texture, proximity, intensity. Atmosphere keeps the system from reducing human experience to text.
The outward expression of the signal. Today, scent is the first physical proof surface. Over time, the same logic can support ambient, spatial, and partner-rendered surfaces.
What happens after the artifact returns to the world. What is accepted, rejected, revisited, revised, or changed later. Response is how the system learns without pretending to read emotion.
The boundary around what the system can use, retain, combine, and forget. The point is not to mine human context. The point is to make it useful without making it extractive.
Context to signal to artifact to response to updated state. The loop is what turns a one-time output into compounding learning.
The compounding asset. A growing map of memory, atmosphere, selection, rejection, artifact, and response patterns that makes future translations more precise. The graph is the moat because it learns from the loop, not from one prompt.